lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Apr]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/7] Introducing (yet again) Device Tree Overlays
From
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 4:23 PM, delicious quinoa
<delicious.quinoa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 3:40 PM, delicious quinoa
> <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:27 PM, delicious quinoa
>> <delicious.quinoa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 4:55 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
>>> <pantelis.antoniou@konsulko.com> wrote:
>>>> The following patchset introduces Device Tree overlays, a method
>>>> of dynamically altering the kernel's live Device Tree, along with
>>>> a generic interface to use it in a board agnostic manner.

[snip]

>>> I can get a NULL pointer when I apply and remove an overlay and the
>>> conditions are right. The overlay applies correctly. The crash is
>>> when I do the rmdir. My overlay is:
>>>
>>> /dts-v1/;
>>> /plugin/;
>>> / {
>>> fragment@0 {
>>> target-path="/soc";
>>> __overlay__ {
>>> #address-cells = <1>;
>>> #size-cells = <1>;
>>> agpio0: agpio0 {
>>> compatible = "altr,pio-1.0";
>>> reg = <0xff210040 0x10>;
>>
>> Added some printks and got a bit further with debug. If I leave this
>> as-is, the platform device has 2 resources. We get the NULL pointer in
>> __release_resource() when releasing the first one (reg). If I remove
>> this one line ('reg =') the crash goes away. So in this case, we are
>> ok when releasing an irq resource but get a NULL pointer when removing
>> a reg resource. Don't know why at this point.
>
> The crash is confirmed on v4 patches as well. The immediate cause of the crash:
>
> static int __release_resource(struct resource *old)
> {
> struct resource *tmp, **p;
>
> p = &old->parent->child;
> for (;;) {
> tmp = *p; <===kablooey
> ...
>
> when __release_resource() is called for the reg resource, it does 'p =
> &olde->parent->child' and then crashes when it does 'tmp = *p'.
>
> Root cause: It appears that there isn't any code in drivers/of/ that
> eventually calls __request_resource() or __insert_resource() so the
> resource's parents/sibling pointers are never initialized. Maybe I'm
> missing some patches or something.

It's probably related to this issue:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/fa.linux.kernel/CTx1ReiOjnQ
http://www.mail-archive.com/linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org/msg63678.html

Rob


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-04-17 00:01    [W:0.066 / U:0.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site