Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 Apr 2014 11:34:52 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH RFC] PM / Hibernate: no kernel_power_off when pm_power_off NULL | From | Sebastian Capella <> |
| |
Ping..
There appears to be disagreement on the correct path to take on this.
Pavel and Alan recommend that arm's machine_power_off shall never return
Russell suggests hibernation be modified to handle machine_power_off returning; that x86 architecture (and others as well) can have machine_power_off returning.
Discussions available at the links below: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/554 -- linux-arm discussion https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/20/649 -- linux-pm discussion
Should I continue with the original hibernation patch from the linux-pm discussion?
Does anyone have any response to Russel's commentsl?
Thanks!
Sebastian
| |