Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 3.14 18/23] iwlwifi: mvm: rs: fix search cycle rules | Date | Fri, 11 Apr 2014 09:12:07 -0700 |
| |
3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eyal Shapira <eyal@wizery.com>
commit 8930b05090acd321b1fc7c642528c697cb105c42 upstream.
We should explore all possible columns when searching to be as resilient as possible to changing conditions. This fixes for example a scenario where even after a sudden creation of rssi difference between the 2 antennas we would keep doing MIMO at a low rate instead of switching to SISO at a higher rate using the better antenna which was the optimal configuration.
Signed-off-by: Eyal Shapira <eyalx.shapira@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c @@ -211,9 +211,9 @@ static const struct rs_tx_column rs_tx_c .next_columns = { RS_COLUMN_LEGACY_ANT_B, RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B, RS_COLUMN_MIMO2, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, + RS_COLUMN_MIMO2_SGI, }, }, [RS_COLUMN_LEGACY_ANT_B] = { @@ -221,10 +221,10 @@ static const struct rs_tx_column rs_tx_c .ant = ANT_B, .next_columns = { RS_COLUMN_LEGACY_ANT_A, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A, RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B, RS_COLUMN_MIMO2, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, + RS_COLUMN_MIMO2_SGI, }, }, [RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A] = { @@ -234,8 +234,8 @@ static const struct rs_tx_column rs_tx_c RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B, RS_COLUMN_MIMO2, RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A_SGI, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B_SGI, + RS_COLUMN_MIMO2_SGI, }, .checks = { rs_siso_allow, @@ -248,8 +248,8 @@ static const struct rs_tx_column rs_tx_c RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A, RS_COLUMN_MIMO2, RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B_SGI, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A_SGI, + RS_COLUMN_MIMO2_SGI, }, .checks = { rs_siso_allow, @@ -263,8 +263,8 @@ static const struct rs_tx_column rs_tx_c RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B_SGI, RS_COLUMN_MIMO2_SGI, RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B, + RS_COLUMN_MIMO2, }, .checks = { rs_siso_allow, @@ -279,8 +279,8 @@ static const struct rs_tx_column rs_tx_c RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A_SGI, RS_COLUMN_MIMO2_SGI, RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A, + RS_COLUMN_MIMO2, }, .checks = { rs_siso_allow, @@ -292,10 +292,10 @@ static const struct rs_tx_column rs_tx_c .ant = ANT_AB, .next_columns = { RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A_SGI, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B_SGI, RS_COLUMN_MIMO2_SGI, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, }, .checks = { rs_mimo_allow, @@ -307,10 +307,10 @@ static const struct rs_tx_column rs_tx_c .sgi = true, .next_columns = { RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A_SGI, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B_SGI, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_A, + RS_COLUMN_SISO_ANT_B, RS_COLUMN_MIMO2, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, - RS_COLUMN_INVALID, }, .checks = { rs_mimo_allow,
| |