Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 10 Apr 2014 21:38:20 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] tracing: syscall_regfunc() should not skip kernel threads |
| |
On 04/10, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Apr 2014 20:14:17 +0200 > Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > And I forgot to mention, given that the kernel_thread() callback should > > call do_exit() itself, then this part of cc3b13c11c567c69a63 > > > > one case when a kernel thread can reach the > > usual syscall exit tracing path: when we create a kernel thread, the > > child comes to ret_from_fork > > > > is no longer relevant? A PF_KTHREAD child should never return from the > > callback and thus it should never do "jmp syscall_exit" ? > > > > Are you sure.
Not.
> On set up of the kthread, create_kthread() calls > kernel_thread() with "kthread()" as its first parameter. > > kernel_thread() then calls do_fork() passing the "kthread" function as > the stack_start parameter, which if you follow where that goes, it gets > to copy_thread() in process_[63][42].c which assigns sp (the function) > to the bx register for the PF_KTHREAD case. But more importantly, it > sets up the stack to have ip pointing to ret_from_kernel_thread (32 bit > version). > > The jmp syscall_exit when it goes to return to "userspace" will in > actuality return to ret_from_kernel_thread (32 bit). Which this does: > > call *PT_EBX(%esp) > > which calls your handler. But then again, this calls syscall_exit when > done, which probably will never be hit as kthread() calls do_exit() > itself. Perhaps if something goes wrong, syscall_exit can handle any > faults that can happen? > > For 64 bit, the check for kernel thread is in ret_from_fork itself. > which does the call *%rbx, but again, if it fails, it then calls > int_ret_from_sys_call, which it may also handle faults.
See my previous email.
I _think_ that the kernel thread can only return from "call *%rbx" if it is no longer a kernel thread, iow, do_execve() was called.
Oleg.
| |