lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 2/8] PNPACPI: use whilte list for pnpacpi device enumeration
From
Date
On Fri, 2014-03-07 at 02:44 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 05:11:08 PM Zhang Rui wrote:
> > +
> > +static int __init acpi_pnp_scan_handler_attach(struct acpi_device *adev,
>
> This can't be __init.
>
> > + const struct acpi_device_id *id)
> > +{
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int __init acpi_pnp_scan_handler_match(char *devid, char *handlerid)
>
> And this too.
>
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (!ispnpidacpi(devid))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (memcmp(devid, handlerid, 3))
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 3; i < 7; i++) {
> > + if (handlerid[i] != 'X' &&
> > + toupper(devid[i]) != toupper(handlerid[i]))
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + return 1;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct acpi_scan_handler pnpacpi_handler __initdata = {
>
> And this cannot be __initdata, because the list of ACPI scan handlers is
> walked during hotplug.
>
right. will update it in next version.

> > + .ids = acpi_pnp_device_ids,
> > + .match = acpi_pnp_scan_handler_match,
> > + .attach = acpi_pnp_scan_handler_attach,
> > +};
> > +
> > +void __init acpi_pnp_init(void)
> > +{
> > + acpi_scan_add_handler(&pnpacpi_handler);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static acpi_status __init pnpacpi_add_device_handler(acpi_handle handle,
> > + u32 lvl, void *context,
> > + void **rv)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_device *device;
> > +
> > + if (acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &device))
> > + return AE_CTRL_DEPTH;
> > + if (device->handler == &pnpacpi_handler)
> > + pnpacpi_add_device(device);
>
> Why don't you do that in acpi_pnp_scan_handler_attach() ?
>
because the PNP bus is not ready at that time.

thanks,
rui



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-09 07:08    [W:0.073 / U:0.488 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site