Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: perf samples too long without perf running (?!?) | From | Paul Bolle <> | Date | Sat, 08 Mar 2014 18:12:46 +0100 |
| |
On Sat, 2014-03-08 at 08:22 -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Is it just me or is this whole situation screwed up for multiple reasons?
One minor reason would be that this message should read (say) perf samples taking too long (2503 ns > 2500 ns), [...]
At least, that's what I thought after diving into the code to see what was causing warnings like these.
And, since apparently things are just fine without administrator intervention, I'd say another minor reason is that printing this at KERN_INFO or KERN_NOTICE level should be enough here.
Paul Bolle
| |