lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] phy: miphy365x: Add Device Tree bindings for the MiPHY365x
> > > +Specifying phy control of devices
> > > +=================================
> > > +
> > > +Device nodes should specify the configuration required in their "phys"
> > > +property, containing a phandle to the miphy device node, a port number
> > > +and a device type.
> > > +
> > > +Example:
> > > +
> > > +#include <dt-bindings/phy/phy-miphy365x.h>
> > > +
> > > + sata0: sata@fe380000 {
> > > + ...
> > > + phys = <&miphy365x_phy MIPHY_PORT_0 MIPHY_TYPE_SATA>;
> > > + ...
> > > + };
> >
> > Is there not a generic phy binding we can point to? It seems a bit
> > redundant to do this in each phy binding.
>
> Sure, but that wouldn't make much of an example.
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-bindings.txt

Ah sorry, I see what you mean now.

No, not yet. That's the next thing to go up into Mainline.

I will replace this second example with a link when the other
documentation document has been accepted.

--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-06 09:01    [W:0.134 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site