Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Viresh Kumar <> | Subject | [PATCH 16/16] hrtimer: use base->hres_active directly instead of hrtimer_hres_active() | Date | Fri, 28 Mar 2014 17:11:35 +0530 |
| |
use base->hres_active directly when we already have a pointer to base instead of calling hrtimer_hres_active(). As that would lead to:
__this_cpu_read(hrtimer_bases.hres_active)
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> --- kernel/hrtimer.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/hrtimer.c b/kernel/hrtimer.c index 83e5f2d..f379821 100644 --- a/kernel/hrtimer.c +++ b/kernel/hrtimer.c @@ -883,7 +883,7 @@ static void __remove_hrtimer(struct hrtimer *timer, unsigned long newstate, #ifdef CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS /* Reprogram the clock event device. if enabled */ - if (reprogram && hrtimer_hres_active() && + if (reprogram && base->cpu_base->hres_active && &timer->node == timerqueue_getnext(&base->active)) { ktime_t expires; @@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ ktime_t hrtimer_get_next_event(void) raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&cpu_base->lock, flags); - if (!hrtimer_hres_active()) { + if (!cpu_base->hres_active) { for (i = 0; i < HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES; i++, base++) { struct hrtimer *timer; struct timerqueue_node *next; @@ -1437,7 +1437,7 @@ void hrtimer_run_queues(void) struct hrtimer_clock_base *base; int index, gettime = 1; - if (hrtimer_hres_active()) + if (cpu_base->hres_active) return; for (index = 0; index < HRTIMER_MAX_CLOCK_BASES; index++) { -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
| |