lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH V2] tick: fix spelling mistake in tick_handle_periodic()
Date
One of the comments in tick_handle_periodic() had 'when' instead of 'which' (My
guess :)). Fix it.

Also fix spelling mistake in 'Possible'.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
V1->V2: Fix spelling mistake of possible as well.

kernel/time/tick-common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
index 20b2fe3..0fec634 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ void tick_handle_periodic(struct clock_event_device *dev)
* to be sure we're using a real hardware clocksource.
* Otherwise we could get trapped in an infinite
* loop, as the tick_periodic() increments jiffies,
- * when then will increment time, posibly causing
+ * which then will increment time, possibly causing
* the loop to trigger again and again.
*/
if (timekeeping_valid_for_hres())
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-25 12:21    [W:0.069 / U:0.144 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site