lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with the tree
Em Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:44:01 +0000
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> escreveu:

> On Thu, 13 Mar 2014 10:17:56 +0100, Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > On Thursday 13 March 2014 00:50:26 Mark Brown wrote:
> > > Hi Greg,
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
> > > drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c between commit b9db140c1e4644d
> > > ("[media] v4l: of: Support empty port nodes") from the v4l tree and
> > > commit fd9fdb78a9bf ("[media] of: move graph helpers from
> > > drivers/media/v4l2-core to drivers/of") from the staging tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up by essentially dropping the support for empty port nodes
> > > since there were more context differences than I was comfortable with
> > > in the changes in the new code.
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken the move of drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-of.c to
> > drivers/of/of-graph.c has been canceled for v3.15 and related patches should
> > be dropped from the for-next branches in the very near future (the v4l tree
> > has already been rebased).
>
> I had not actually asked Mauro to revert,

See:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/10/283

There, you literally answered me that:
"All trees containing the branch would need to be reverted."
and:
"It means any tree containing that branch *must* be rewound."

That's what I (unhappily) did.

I won't reapply this series, but, instead, I'll simply wait for the
staging tree to be merged before sending those patches upstream,
before sending the topic branch with exynos 5 patches that depend on it.

This way, I can add Stephen patch on such topic branch, to avoid
compilation breakages after merged.

> but the branch is still in rmk's
> tree and linux-next. I do not think it needs to be cancelled.

> I do still have issues about it as a generic pattern, but I'm happy with
> the discussion so far and the documentation will be sorted before the
> next kernel is released.
>
> g.

Regards,
Mauro


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-21 05:01    [W:0.177 / U:0.204 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site