Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:03:28 +0530 | Subject | Re: [RFC v3] cpufreq: Make sure frequency transitions are serialized | From | Viresh Kumar <> |
| |
On 20 March 2014 14:54, Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On 03/20/2014 02:07 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> WARN_ON(policy->transition_ongoing); >> > > I guess you meant WARN_ON(!policy->transition_ongoing) > perhaps?
Ooops!!
> I'm not sure whether its really worth it, because it kinda looks > obvious. Not sure what kind of bugs it would catch. I can't think of any > such scenario :-(
Just to catch if somebody is sending a POSTCHANGE one without first sending a PRECHANGE one.. Just another check to make sure things are in order.
| |