lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH V2] regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf()
Date
For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts()
instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch
warning.

WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf

Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Removed unnecessary seq_puts() in ux500_regulator_power_state_cnt_print()
in order to prevent build error, per Fengguang Wu.

drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c b/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c
index ce89f78..ac2c1d6 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c
@@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ static int ux500_regulator_status_print(struct seq_file *s, void *p)
int i;

/* print dump header */
- err = seq_printf(s, "ux500-regulator status:\n");
+ err = seq_puts(s, "ux500-regulator status:\n");
if (err < 0)
- dev_err(dev, "seq_printf overflow\n");
+ dev_err(dev, "seq_puts overflow\n");

err = seq_printf(s, "%31s : %8s : %8s\n", "current",
"before", "after");
--
1.7.10.4



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-19 02:01    [W:0.142 / U:1.784 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site