Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Jingoo Han <> | Subject | [PATCH V2] regulator: dbx500: use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf() | Date | Wed, 19 Mar 2014 09:26:17 +0900 |
| |
For a constant format without additional arguments, use seq_puts() instead of seq_printf(). Also, it fixes the following checkpatch warning.
WARNING: Prefer seq_puts to seq_printf
Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> --- Changes since v1: - Removed unnecessary seq_puts() in ux500_regulator_power_state_cnt_print() in order to prevent build error, per Fengguang Wu.
drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c b/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c index ce89f78..ac2c1d6 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/dbx500-prcmu.c @@ -127,9 +127,9 @@ static int ux500_regulator_status_print(struct seq_file *s, void *p) int i; /* print dump header */ - err = seq_printf(s, "ux500-regulator status:\n"); + err = seq_puts(s, "ux500-regulator status:\n"); if (err < 0) - dev_err(dev, "seq_printf overflow\n"); + dev_err(dev, "seq_puts overflow\n"); err = seq_printf(s, "%31s : %8s : %8s\n", "current", "before", "after"); -- 1.7.10.4
| |