lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-next][regression] [PATCH] percpu: add preemption checks to __this_cpu ops
On 03/18/2014 04:37 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>
>> diff --git a/lib/smp_processor_id.c b/lib/smp_processor_id.c
>> index a270dce..73a2004 100644
>> --- a/lib/smp_processor_id.c
>> +++ b/lib/smp_processor_id.c
>> @@ -58,9 +58,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(debug_smp_processor_id);
>>
>> notrace void __this_cpu_preempt_check(const char *op)
>> {
>> - char text[40];
>> -
>> - snprintf(text, sizeof(text), "__this_cpu_%s()", op);
>> - check_preemption_disabled(text);
>> + check_preemption_disabled(op);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__this_cpu_preempt_check);
>
> So it looks like there is an early this cpu operation in a context that
> cannot handle snprintf. But the checks in check_preemption_disabled()
> avoid processing there so that works.

Just to be sure that I've described time point of issue correctly:
[ 2.161746] dwc3 2690000.dwc3: failed to initialize core
[ 2.167255] dwc3: probe of 2690000.dwc3 failed with error -38
[ 2.259687] Freeing unused kernel memory: 280K (c0678000 - c06be000)

Please press Enter to activate this console.
^^^ system stall here


Any way, I can boot and console works fine with your change :)
Thanks.

Tested-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>

>
> We could fix this by moving the string concatenation operation into
> the check function.
>
> Index: linux/lib/smp_processor_id.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/lib/smp_processor_id.c 2014-03-18 09:36:31.330450525 -0500
> +++ linux/lib/smp_processor_id.c 2014-03-18 09:36:37.822315534 -0500
> @@ -7,7 +7,8 @@
> #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
>
> -notrace static unsigned int check_preemption_disabled(char *what)
> +notrace static unsigned int check_preemption_disabled(const char *what1,
> + const char *what2)
> {
> int this_cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
>
> @@ -38,8 +39,8 @@
> if (!printk_ratelimit())
> goto out_enable;
>
> - printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: using %s in preemptible [%08x] code: %s/%d\n",
> - what, preempt_count() - 1, current->comm, current->pid);
> + printk(KERN_ERR "BUG: using %s%s() in preemptible [%08x] code: %s/%d\n",
> + what1, what2, preempt_count() - 1, current->comm, current->pid);
>
> print_symbol("caller is %s\n", (long)__builtin_return_address(0));
> dump_stack();
> @@ -52,15 +53,12 @@
>
> notrace unsigned int debug_smp_processor_id(void)
> {
> - return check_preemption_disabled("smp_processor_id()");
> + return check_preemption_disabled("smp_processor_id","");
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(debug_smp_processor_id);
>
> notrace void __this_cpu_preempt_check(const char *op)
> {
> - char text[40];
> -
> - snprintf(text, sizeof(text), "__this_cpu_%s()", op);
> - check_preemption_disabled(text);
> + check_preemption_disabled("__this_cpu_", op);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__this_cpu_preempt_check);
>





\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-18 16:41    [W:0.480 / U:0.076 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site