Messages in this thread | | | From | "Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <> | Subject | RE: [RFC V2] mfd: da9063: Add support for production silicon variant code | Date | Mon, 17 Mar 2014 08:33:36 +0000 |
| |
On 14 March 2014 14:37 Philipp Zabel wrote:
>Hi, > >Am Freitag, den 14.02.2014, 16:43 +0000 schrieb Lee Jones: >> > From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com> >> > >> > Add the correct silicon variant code ID (0x5) to the driver. This >> > new code is the 'production' variant code ID for DA9063. >> > >> > This patch will remove the older variant code ID which matches the >> > pre-production silicon ID (0x3) for the DA9063 chip. >> > >> > There is also some small amount of correction done in this patch: >> > it splits the revision code and correctly names it according to >> > the hardware specification and moves the dev_info() call before >> > the variant ID test. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@diasemi.com> >> >> Applied, thanks. > >we have a few i.MX6 Modules (imx6q-phytec-pfla02) with DA9063 PMICs that >all report the model/revision ID as 0x61/0x03. Those are marked as >follows: > dialog DA9063 44 1240EHDA > dialog DA9063 44 1312ECAF >We now have received a report from Phytec that those PMICs were not >marketed as preproduction in any way, but as a normal mask revision.
I will speak with our AEs this morning and try and get an answer to this one.
>Their Dialog Semiconductor contact talked about AD, BA, and BB silicon >variants. How do those relate to the variant register value and to the >markings on the chips? >There seems to be a serious miscommunication somewhere.
Regards, Steve
| |