lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] net: Implement SO_PEERCGROUP
I don't buy that it is not practical.  Not convenient, maybe.  Not
clean, sure. But it is practical - it uses mechanisms that exist on
all kernels today. That is a win, to me.

On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Simo Sorce <ssorce@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 10:55 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> So give each container its own unix socket. Problem solved, no?
>
> Not really practical if you have hundreds of containers.
>
> Simo.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-13 19:41    [W:0.135 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site