Messages in this thread | | | From | Tim Hockin <> | Date | Thu, 13 Mar 2014 11:05:15 -0700 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] net: Implement SO_PEERCGROUP |
| |
I don't buy that it is not practical. Not convenient, maybe. Not clean, sure. But it is practical - it uses mechanisms that exist on all kernels today. That is a win, to me.
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Simo Sorce <ssorce@redhat.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2014-03-13 at 10:55 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >> So give each container its own unix socket. Problem solved, no? > > Not really practical if you have hundreds of containers. > > Simo. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |