Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 12 Mar 2014 15:00:48 -0400 | From | Waiman Long <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] locking: qspinlock |
| |
On 03/12/2014 02:24 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:17:46PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote: >> Except that I do a single atomic short integer write to switch the bits >> instead of 2 byte write. > D'0h why didn't I think of that. A single short write is much better > than the 2 byte writes. > > In any case; can you try and keep the structure in this patch-set if you > post another version? It takes a lot of effort to unravel your > all-in-one patch.
I didn't have time to fully review and test your changes yet. So I just post a new series of what I currently have right now. I will certainly do the testing on your patches.
-Longman
| |