lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH -mm] mm,numa,mprotect: always continue after finding a stable thp page
On 03/11/2014 01:33 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 03/11/2014 01:00 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On 03/11/2014 12:51 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>> On 03/11/2014 12:28 PM, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Mar 07, 2014 at 06:27:45PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
>>>>>> This is a completely untested prototype. It rechecks pmd_trans_huge
>>>>>> under the lock and falls through if it hit a parallel split. It's not
>>>>>> perfect because it could decide to fall through just because there
>>>>>> was
>>>>>> no prot_numa work to do but it's for illustration purposes. Secondly,
>>>>>> I noted that you are calling invalidate for every pmd range. Is that
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> a lot of invalidations? We could do the same by just tracking the
>>>>>> address
>>>>>> of the first invalidation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And there were other minor issues. This is still untested but Sasha,
>>>>> can you try it out please? I discussed this with Rik on IRC for a bit
>>>>> and
>>>>> reckon this should be sufficient if the correct race has been
>>>>> identified.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any luck with this patch Sasha? It passed basic tests here but I had
>>>> not
>>>> seen the issue trigger either.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, I've been stuck in my weekend project of getting lockdep to work
>>> with page locks :)
>>>
>>> It takes a moment to test, so just to be sure - I should have only this
>>> last patch applied?
>>> Without the one in the original mail?
>>
>> Indeed, only this patch should do it.
>
> Okay. So just this patch on top of the latest -next shows the following
> issues:

OK, those are all issues with Davidlohr Bueso's
per-thread vma cache patch :)



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-11 21:21    [W:0.080 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site