Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions | From | Ben Hutchings <> | Date | Mon, 10 Mar 2014 17:52:42 +0000 |
| |
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 +0000 > Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote: > > > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > Here's the new patch: > > > > Doesn't add #includes and doesn't change any types, so of course it > > doesn't compile. WTF? > > > > Hi Ben, > > This is an old thread. Which kernel did you apply it to. Before I send > any patch set out, I run a small test (heavy stress test, and also > compile several different configs). This patch was against 3.10-rt, and > may have already had the includes needed. I know the original patch > compiled, but I may not have tested the second patch. > > Do you need this patch? Or did I miss something for 3.2-rt?
You applied it to 3.2-rt:
commit 916c8d2de3c4759f57426fa3cfee63b491e88939 Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Date: Mon Oct 28 11:50:06 2013 +0100
swait: Add a few more users
and 3.4-rt, 3.8-rt, 3.10-rt. So far as I can see, it is broken on all of those branches, though I only actually tried building 3.2-rt.
Ben.
-- Ben Hutchings Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |