lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH RT 2/5] a few open coded completions
From
Date
On Mon, 2014-03-10 at 10:29 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 00:27:21 +0000
> Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2013-12-11 at 14:49 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > Here's the new patch:
> >
> > Doesn't add #includes and doesn't change any types, so of course it
> > doesn't compile. WTF?
> >
>
> Hi Ben,
>
> This is an old thread. Which kernel did you apply it to. Before I send
> any patch set out, I run a small test (heavy stress test, and also
> compile several different configs). This patch was against 3.10-rt, and
> may have already had the includes needed. I know the original patch
> compiled, but I may not have tested the second patch.
>
> Do you need this patch? Or did I miss something for 3.2-rt?

You applied it to 3.2-rt:

commit 916c8d2de3c4759f57426fa3cfee63b491e88939
Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon Oct 28 11:50:06 2013 +0100

swait: Add a few more users

and 3.4-rt, 3.8-rt, 3.10-rt. So far as I can see, it is broken on all
of those branches, though I only actually tried building 3.2-rt.

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
Computers are not intelligent. They only think they are.
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-11 09:04    [W:2.099 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site