Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:38:43 +0100 | From | Sander Eikelenboom <> | Subject | [RC6 Bell Chime] Re: [PATCH 00/24] rfcomm fixes |
| |
Hi all,
Since: - 3.14-RC6 has been cut - this regression is known and reported since the merge window - the fix (revert of 3 patches) is known for over a month now - but it's still not in mainline - my polite ping request from last week seems to have provoked exactly 0 (zero) response.
IT'S TIME TO CHIME SOME BELLS :-)
Hope that WILL be heard somewhere ...
-- Sander
PS. on the informative side the 3 commits to be reverted are:
f86772af6a0f643d3e13eb3f4f9213ae0c333ee4 Bluetooth: Remove rfcomm_carrier_raised() 4a2fb3ecc7467c775b154813861f25a0ddc11aa0 Bluetooth: Always wait for a connection on RFCOMM open() e228b63390536f5b737056059a9a04ea016b1abf Bluetooth: Move rfcomm_get_device() before rfcomm_dev_activate()
Monday, March 3, 2014, 8:38:53 PM, you wrote:
> Wednesday, February 12, 2014, 12:06:44 PM, you wrote:
>> Monday, February 10, 2014, 11:09:38 PM, you wrote:
>>> Hi Peter,
>>>> This patch series addresses a number of previously unknown issues >>>> with the RFCOMM tty device implementation, in addition to >>>> addressing the locking regression recently reported [1]. >>>> >>>> As Gianluca suggested and I agree, this series first reverts >>>> 3 of the 4 patches of 3.14-rc1 for bluetooth/rfcomm/tty.c.
>>> so for 3.14 we should revert 3 patches. And then the other 21 are intended for 3.15 merge window.
>>> I realize that we still have to deal with some breakage, but we do not want regressions and I clearly not going to take 24 patches for 3.14 at this point in time.
>>> What I can do is take all 24 patches into bluetooth-next and let them sit for 1 week and have people test them. And then we go ahead with reverting 3 patches from 3.14. Does that make sense?
>> Reverting those 3 patches works for me.
>> -- >> Sander
>>> Regards
>>> Marcel
> Hi Marcel,
> Ping... it seems these 3 reverts are still not in 3.14-rc5 to fix the regressions ?
> -- > Sander
-- Best regards, Sander mailto:linux@eikelenboom.it
| |