lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Mar]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ACPI/Sleep: pm_power_off need more sanity check to be installed
Date
On Saturday, March 01, 2014 06:24:23 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/2/28 13:33, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> > On 2014/2/27 7:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:46:37 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
> >>> Sleep control and status registers need santity check before ACPI
> >>> install acpi_power_off to pm_power_off hook. The checking code in
> >>> acpi_enter_sleep_state() is too late, we should not allow a not-working
> >>> pm_power_off function hooked.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@intel.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/acpi/sleep.c | 7 +++++--
> >>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> >>> index b718806..0284d22 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> >>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sleep.c
> >>> @@ -809,8 +809,11 @@ int __init acpi_sleep_init(void)
> >>> status = acpi_get_sleep_type_data(ACPI_STATE_S5, &type_a, &type_b);
> >>> if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> >>> sleep_states[ACPI_STATE_S5] = 1;
> >>
> >> Do we still want to set this if the check below fails? If so, then why?
> >
> > We know \_S5_ is valid. The fault is sleep registers, not S5 ACPI object
>
> Hi Rafael, do you still have any concern?

Well, I simply don't think we should say that it is "supported" if we aren't
going to do anything with it.


> >>
> >>> - pm_power_off_prepare = acpi_power_off_prepare;
> >>> - pm_power_off = acpi_power_off;
> >>> + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.sleep_control.address &&
> >>> + acpi_gbl_FADT.sleep_status.address) {
> >>> + pm_power_off_prepare = acpi_power_off_prepare;
> >>> + pm_power_off = acpi_power_off;
> >>> + }
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> supported[0] = 0;
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-03-02 02:01    [W:0.787 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site