Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 09 Feb 2014 19:25:34 -0800 | From | Laura Abbott <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv2 2/2] arm: Get rid of meminfo |
| |
On 2/6/2014 6:09 PM, Courtney Cavin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 01:02:31AM +0100, Laura Abbott wrote: >> memblock is now fully integrated into the kernel and is the prefered >> method for tracking memory. Rather than reinvent the wheel with >> meminfo, migrate to using memblock directly instead of meminfo as >> an intermediate. >> >> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <lauraa@codeaurora.org> > [...] >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c >> index 0b11c1a..51d814e 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-pxa/spitz.c >> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ >> #include <linux/io.h> >> #include <linux/module.h> >> #include <linux/reboot.h> >> +#include <linux/memblock.h> >> >> #include <asm/setup.h> >> #include <asm/mach-types.h> >> @@ -971,13 +972,9 @@ static void __init spitz_init(void) >> spitz_i2c_init(); >> } >> >> -static void __init spitz_fixup(struct tag *tags, char **cmdline, >> - struct meminfo *mi) >> +static void __init spitz_fixup(struct tag *tags, char **cmdline) >> { >> - sharpsl_save_param(); >> - mi->nr_banks = 1; >> - mi->bank[0].start = 0xa0000000; >> - mi->bank[0].size = (64*1024*1024); >> + memblock_addr(0xa0000000, SZ_64M); > > memblock_add() ? Yes, that was a typo on my part. I'll send out a v3 with collected acks.
> > -Courtney >
-- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
| |