lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [GIT PULL] liblockdep fixes for v3.14
On 02/09/2014 07:53 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> The following changes since commit 65370bdf881e20907e7a53abab9b8c0bc5f60a6b:
>>
>> Merge branch 'linus' into core/locking (2014-02-02 09:43:20 +0100)
>>
>> are available in the git repository at:
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/sashalevin/liblockdep.git liblockdep-fixes
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to a521b55af18ac72c969c1ba41b660d77dae37357:
>>
>> liblockdep: add a stub for new rcu_is_watching (2014-02-05 18:03:54 -0500)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ira W. Snyder (3):
>> tools: lockdep: fix initialization code path
>> tools: lockdep: fix include of asm/hash.h
>> tools: lockdep: add include directory to allow tests to compile
>>
>> Sasha Levin (2):
>> liblockdep: mark runtests.sh as executable
>> liblockdep: add a stub for new rcu_is_watching
>
> So I have a couple of nits about the commits:
>
> 1)
>
> Please use the following standard tags/prefixes:
>
> tools/liblockdep: Fix initialization code path
> ...
>
> and also capitalize sentences properly.
>
> 2)
>
> Faulty SOB sequences:
>
> Author: Ira W. Snyder <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
> Date: Fri Jan 31 13:35:32 2014 -0800
>
> tools: lockdep: add include directory to allow tests to compile
>
> Acked-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ira W. Snyder <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
>
>
> That's not how we do signoffs, maintainer commits should be:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ira W. Snyder <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
>
>
> As a side note, that's not a valid Ack sequence either, which if done
> should be the other way around:
>
> Signed-off-by: Ira W. Snyder <iws@ovro.caltech.edu>
> Acked-by: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>
>
> 3)
>
> It's not clear which patch you are referring to here:
>
> This patch mirrors the fix used for perf, titled "tools: perf:
> util: fix include for non x86 architectures".
>
> It's neither in the series, nor in upstream.

Thanks for the review Ingo, this was my first time doing a pull request. I'll fix everything and resend.

About 3, Arnaldo pulled that patch into -tip a week ago (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/2/2/34).


Thanks,
Sasha



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-10 03:21    [W:0.252 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site