lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework
From
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Torvald Riegel <triegel@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> (a) seems to say that you don't like requiring programmers to mark
> atomic accesses specially. Is that the case?

In Paul's example, they were marked specially.

And you seemed to argue that Paul's example could possibly return
anything but 0/0.

If you really think that, I hope to God that you have nothing to do
with the C standard or any actual compiler I ever use.

Because such a standard or compiler would be shit. It's sadly not too uncommon.

Linus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-10 02:41    [W:0.268 / U:0.484 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site