Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:06:00 -0800 (PST) | From | Hugh Dickins <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] cgroup: use an ordered workqueue for cgroup destruction |
| |
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Tejun Heo wrote: > On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:20:44PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote: > > > You don't return to this concern in the following mails of the thread: > > did you later decide that it actually won't be a problem? I'll assume > > so for the moment, since you took the patch, but please reassure me. > > I was just worrying about a different solution where we take > css_offline invocation outside of cgroup_mutex and bumping up > max_active. There's nothing to worry about your patch. Sorry about > not being clear. :)
Thanks a lot for your detailed and admirably responsive explanations. You were looking ahead, I see that now, and I'm gratefully reassured :)
Hugh
| |