lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH 3.11 021/233] writeback: Fix data corruption on NFS
Date
3.11.10.4 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

commit f9b0e058cbd04ada76b13afffa7e1df830543c24 upstream.

Commit 4f8ad655dbc8 "writeback: Refactor writeback_single_inode()" added
a condition to skip clean inode. However this is wrong in WB_SYNC_ALL
mode because there we also want to wait for outstanding writeback on
possibly clean inode. This was causing occasional data corruption issues
on NFS because it uses sync_inode() to make sure all outstanding writes
are flushed to the server before truncating the inode and with
sync_inode() returning prematurely file was sometimes extended back
by an outstanding write after it was truncated.

So modify the test to also check for pages under writeback in
WB_SYNC_ALL mode.

Fixes: 4f8ad655dbc82cf05d2edc11e66b78a42d38bf93
Reported-and-tested-by: Dan Duval <dan.duval@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@canonical.com>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 15 +++++++++------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index 68851ff..52e5934 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -508,13 +508,16 @@ writeback_single_inode(struct inode *inode, struct bdi_writeback *wb,
}
WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_SYNC);
/*
- * Skip inode if it is clean. We don't want to mess with writeback
- * lists in this function since flusher thread may be doing for example
- * sync in parallel and if we move the inode, it could get skipped. So
- * here we make sure inode is on some writeback list and leave it there
- * unless we have completely cleaned the inode.
+ * Skip inode if it is clean and we have no outstanding writeback in
+ * WB_SYNC_ALL mode. We don't want to mess with writeback lists in this
+ * function since flusher thread may be doing for example sync in
+ * parallel and if we move the inode, it could get skipped. So here we
+ * make sure inode is on some writeback list and leave it there unless
+ * we have completely cleaned the inode.
*/
- if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY))
+ if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) &&
+ (wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL ||
+ !mapping_tagged(inode->i_mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK)))
goto out;
inode->i_state |= I_SYNC;
spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
--
1.8.3.2


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-07 15:01    [W:0.711 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site