Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 6 Feb 2014 23:33:23 +0000 | From | "Joseph S. Myers" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework |
| |
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> I think that if we have different options, there needs to be agreement > on which to choose across the compilers, at the very least. I don't > quite know how this looks like for GCC and LLVM, for example.
I'm not sure we even necessarily get compatibility for the alignment of _Atomic types yet (and no ABI document I've seen discusses that issue).
-- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com
| |