Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:19:18 -0300 | From | Ezequiel Garcia <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/14] of: mtd: add documentation for nand-ecc-level property |
| |
Hi Grant, Boris:
(BTW, dropped Russell, Rob Landley and some unrelated mailing lists from Cc, and added Thomas, Gregory and Rob Herring).
On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:34:44PM +0100, Boris BREZILLON wrote: > On 05/02/2014 12:15, Grant Likely wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2014 14:53:32 -0300, Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> wrote: [..] > >> > >> Maybe we can discuss about it now? > >> > >> nand-ecc-strength : integer ECC required strength. > >> nand-ecc-size : integer step size associated to the ECC strength. > > I'm okay with either, but the above binding is indeed more readable. > > That's fine by me, if everybody agrees, let's go for the > nand-ecc-strength/nand-ecc-size couple then. >
Great. So, if some DT dictator^C^Cmaintainers can Ack this binding, I can send a new patchset, with pxa3xx-nand using it...
> I'll rebase next version of my series on Ezequiel's patch providing > these OF helpers. >
... and then you can base on it?
This is the original patchset:
http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58764 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/58763
-- Ezequiel García, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |