lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [3]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpu0: make THERMAL_CPU support optional
From
Cc'ing the guy who introduced this bug..

On 2 February 2014 04:20, Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
>
> The addition of THERMAL and THERMAL_CPU selections causes a kconfig
> warning on highbank platforms:
>
> warning: (ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) selects GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0 which has
> unmet direct dependencies (ARCH_HAS_CPUFREQ && CPU_FREQ && HAVE_CLK &&
> REGULATOR && OF && THERMAL && CPU_THERMAL)
>
> The cpufreq-cpu0 driver does not require thermal zone support, and it
> should be selectable independently. Add a new kconfig option to enable
> this feature.
>
> Reported-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> index 4b029c0..a197a04a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ config CPU_FREQ_GOV_CONSERVATIVE
>
> config GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0
> tristate "Generic CPU0 cpufreq driver"
> - depends on HAVE_CLK && REGULATOR && OF && THERMAL && CPU_THERMAL
> + depends on HAVE_CLK && REGULATOR && OF

That's fine as code would still compile due to dummy routines..

> select PM_OPP
> help
> This adds a generic cpufreq driver for CPU0 frequency management.
> @@ -194,6 +194,14 @@ config GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0
>
> If in doubt, say N.
>
> +config GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0_THERMAL
> + bool "Thermal zone support for Generic CPU0 cpufreq"
> + depends on GENERIC_CPUFREQ_CPU0
> + select THERMAL
> + select THERMAL_CPU
> + help
> + This adds thermal support to the generic cpufreq driver for CPU0.

But do we really need this? Let the platform enable THERMAL
and THERMAL_CPU themselves, as this was the case currently.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-03 07:41    [W:0.047 / U:2.272 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site