Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Tue, 25 Feb 2014 20:23:35 +0100 | From | Sebastian Hesselbarth <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/10] pinctrl: mvebu: remove hard-coded addresses from Dove pinctrl |
| |
[Cooked down Cc list to relevant people and added Ezequiel who agreed to test on Armada 375/38x.]
On 02/25/2014 04:43 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 04:30:45PM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote: >> On 02/25/14 16:16, Jason Cooper wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 10:36:54AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: >>>> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 7:10 PM, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> wrote: >>>>> I've now created mvebu/pinctrl-dove for this series. It's based on >>>>> v3.14-rc1, and depends on mvebu/pinctrl (which depends on >>>>> mvebu/pinctrl-3xx). >>>>> >>>>> I've kept this series in a separate branch in case we encounter an >>>>> unforeseen problem with something in here. Then this branch can be >>>>> dropped, and /pinctrl-3xx and /pinctrl will still make it in. >>>>> >>>>> So, all patches except 3 and 4 are in mvebu/pinctrl-dove. 3 and 4 are >>>>> in mvebu/dt. >>>> >>>> OK so what should I be pulling in first now? >>> >>> Of course I woke up this morning not happy with this :-/ Here's what it >>> looks like currently: >>> >>> /v3.14-rc1 >>> | >>> --+---+---+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl-3xx >>> | \ >>> |---+---+---+---+---+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl >>> \ \ >>> \---------------------------+---+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl-dove >>> >>> Not to scale. >>> >>> >>> I would prefer to do: >>> >>> /v3.14-rc1 >>> | >>> --+---+---+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl-cleanup >>> | \ >>> |----------------+--+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl-3xx >>> \ \ >>> \----------------+---+---+--+---+---+---+ mvebu/pinctrl-dove >>> >>> But this would mean moving some patches to branches other than what they >>> were sent with. The advantage is that /pinctrl-3xx and /pinctrl-dove >>> don't depend on each other, and only depend on -cleanup. Which is great >>> if there is something wrong in either branch. >>> >>> Sebastian, I can cherry-pick the patches around, but you know the code >>> better than any of us, do you foresee any problems with this scenario? >> >> If Thomas agrees, I can rework Armada 375/38x pinctrl stubs to fit on >> mvebu/pinctrl. That should allow you to have mvebu/pinctrl-dove >> independent of mvebu/pinctrl-3xx. >> >> Not a big deal, I'd just pick 375/38x patches from mvebu/pinctrl and >> squash them into mvebu/pinctrl-3xx. The only "issue" is that DT >> documentation update patches from mvebu/pinctrl-dove have to be split >> too. >> >> I'll prepare the three new branches for you and Thomas to look at >> today. > > Ok, great. Thanks Sebastian!
Ok, branches based on v3.14-rc1 with above dependencies can be found on:
https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git for-mvebu/pinctrl-cleanup https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git for-mvebu/pinctrl-3xx https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git for-mvebu/pinctrl-dove
and an a-i-o branch to ease testing:
https://github.com/shesselba/linux-dove.git for-mvebu/all-merged-in
@Jason: I guess we should resend all three branches as individual patches on list somehow.
Sebastian
|  |