[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 17:58:18 +0000 (UTC)
Mathieu Desnoyers <> wrote:

> > The one that I replied to. I can't pull the module patch unless I get
> > an ack from Rusty.
> Do you mean the internal API semantic change you propose for tracepoints ?
> If yes, then how do you consider this a fix worthy of being backported to
> stable ?

Actually, for now, I'm going to just add a nasty warning when a module
fails to load the tracepoints. At least that should notify people that
what went wrong.

-- Steve

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-26 09:41    [W:0.089 / U:8.268 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site