lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [patch 07/26] pci: pcie-designware: Remove irq_desc abuse
On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 4:33 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com> wrote:
>> > On Monday, February 24, 2014 6:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> >>
>> >> There is no reason to care about irq_desc in that context, escpecially
>> >> as irq_data for that interrupt is retrieved as well.
>> >>
>> >> Use the proper accessor for the msi descriptor
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> >> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>> >> Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
>> >> Cc: Mohit Kumar <mohit.kumar@st.com>
>> >> Cc: pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>>
>> Thomas, I assume you'll merge this along with the rest of your series.
>> I don't have any pending changes in this area.
>
> I can do, but it does not depend on anything else, so you can pick it
> up as well. Either way is fine.

I never know what to do with these. I suggested that you pick it up
so the whole series would be together, because I assumed it would make
more sense in the git history to have all these similar changes
grouped together. But maybe that really doesn't matter.

What's the recommended practice?

Bjorn


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-25 00:41    [W:0.044 / U:0.672 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site