lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Thomas
> Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
> "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 12:39:26 PM
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
>
> On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 16:55:36 +0000 (UTC)
> Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> > > To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> > > Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Ingo
> > > Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>, "Thomas
> > > Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>, "Rusty Russell" <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
> > > "David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
> > > "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014 10:54:54 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new
> > > TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
> > >
> > [...]
> >
> > (keeping discussion for later, as I'm busy at a client site)
> >
> > > For now, I'm going to push this in, and also mark it for stable.
> >
> > Which patch or patches do you plan to pull, and which is marked for stable
> > ?
>
> The one that I replied to. I can't pull the module patch unless I get
> an ack from Rusty.

Do you mean the internal API semantic change you propose for tracepoints ?
If yes, then how do you consider this a fix worthy of being backported to
stable ?

Thanks,

Mathieu

>
> >
> > This thread is a RFC PATCH. I posted a separate more complete patch in
> > a separate thread marked [PATCH].
>
> Yeah, I'll post it out soon enough.
>
> -- Steve
>

--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-24 19:41    [W:0.114 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site