lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Subject: Warning in workqueue.c
On 02/14/2014 11:25 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> ...
> Hmmm... weird, p's rq shouldn't have changed without its cpus_allowed
> busted. Anyways, let's wait for Jason's test results and see whether
> this is a regression at all.

I was unable to determine exactly when this behavior was introduced. The
reason for this is because I keep hitting other bugs that prevent the
test case from running, the most notable of which causes an immediate
system hang. I also hit other warnings and bug messages and I'm not sure
if they are related or if they will influence the probability of hitting
the problem we are trying to solve here. What I did find is the following:

We hit this problem as far back as v3.10.
The warning was introduced after v3.5 but before v3.6.

--
-- Jason J. Herne (jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com)



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-24 16:41    [W:0.197 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site