[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [RFC] improve_stack: make stack dump output useful again
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 4:19 PM, Sasha Levin <> wrote:
> Right now when people try to report issues in the kernel they send stack
> dumps to eachother, which looks something like this:
> [ 6.906437] [<ffffffff811f0e90>] ? backtrace_test_irq_callback+0x20/0x20
> [ 6.907121] [<ffffffff84388ce8>] dump_stack+0x52/0x7f
> [ 6.907640] [<ffffffff811f0ec8>] backtrace_regression_test+0x38/0x110
> [ 6.908281] [<ffffffff813596a0>] ? proc_create_data+0xa0/0xd0
> [ 6.908870] [<ffffffff870a8040>] ? proc_modules_init+0x22/0x22
> [ 6.909480] [<ffffffff810020c2>] do_one_initcall+0xc2/0x1e0
> [...]
> However, most of the text you get is pure garbage.

I'd like to fix that, but I'd like to fix it in the kernel, and just
stop printing the hex addresses entirely.

However, your kind of script actually makes that worse, in that it
uses the redundant hex addresses for 'addr2line', and that tool is
known to not work with symbolic addresses, only with actual numerical

So I would *really* want to do this kernel change (possibly
conditional on RANDOMIZE_BASE_ADDRESS or whatever the config variable
is called):

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index d9c12d3022a7..58039e728f00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -27,13 +27,12 @@ static int die_counter;

static void printk_stack_address(unsigned long address, int reliable)
- pr_cont(" [<%p>] %s%pB\n",
- (void *)address, reliable ? "" : "? ", (void *)address);
+ pr_cont(" %s[<%pB>]\n", reliable ? "" : "? ", (void *)address);

void printk_address(unsigned long address)
- pr_cont(" [<%p>] %pS\n", (void *)address, (void *)address);
+ pr_cont(" [<%pS>]\n", (void *)address);


which would make the kernel stack traces much prettier.

But that would require that there be a "resolve symbolic address" (if
CONFIG_KALLSYMS isn't enabled, it would still be hexadecimal) for the
address inside the [<>] thing..

I don't know of any sane tool that does that directly, but it
shouldn't be *that* hard. You can *almost* do it with

echo "p backtrace_regression_test+0x38" | gdb vmlinux

but you see the problem if you try that ;)


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-23 22:01    [W:0.089 / U:0.324 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site