[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/2] x86: Support compiling out human-friendly processor feature names
On 02/22/2014 01:36 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> No, even after removing the ifdefs around the build rules as you
> suggested (and v3's fixes for the resulting build issues, notably
> changing some -y's to -$(CONFIG_X86_FEATURE_NAMES)), the makefiles still
> manage to not build mkcpustr or cpustr.h, because nothing depends on it.

How could it miss the rule:

$(obj)/cpu.o: $(obj)/cpustr.h

> I could change the build rules to generate an empty cpustr.h and avoid
> this ifdef, but that'd require an additional ifdef block in the Makefile.

Typically the way it is done is to generate the #ifdef *inside*
cpustr.h. However, cpustr.h is kind of special anyway so it probably
doesn't matter.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-23 19:41    [W:0.056 / U:0.288 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site