lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] [RFC] time: Improve negative offset handling in timekeeping_inject_offset
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014, John Stultz wrote:
> But yes, we can just leave it as is, and it is a bit academic. But

To be honest, I was mostly arguing due to the academic nature. :)

The important point is that we restrict it to -1e9 < tv_nsec <
1e9. The signed/unsigned combos are not that interesting as long as
our internal helpers cope nicely with that.

Thanks,

tglx


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-22 11:41    [W:0.044 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site