lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 9/9] trace: Replace hardcoding of 19 with MAX_NICE.
Hi Peter.
It seems the all other patches in this set were all applied to tip
except this one.
What is the problem with the [9/9]? Is there any thing I can do?

Thanx


On 02/11/2014 03:34 PM, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> index a5457d5..0434ff1 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer_benchmark.c
> @@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ static int write_iteration = 50;
> module_param(write_iteration, uint, 0644);
> MODULE_PARM_DESC(write_iteration, "# of writes between timestamp readings");
>
> -static int producer_nice = 19;
> -static int consumer_nice = 19;
> +static int producer_nice = MAX_NICE;
> +static int consumer_nice = MAX_NICE;
>
> static int producer_fifo = -1;
> static int consumer_fifo = -1;
> @@ -308,7 +308,7 @@ static void ring_buffer_producer(void)
>
> /* Let the user know that the test is running at low priority */
> if (producer_fifo < 0 && consumer_fifo < 0 &&
> - producer_nice == 19 && consumer_nice == 19)
> + producer_nice == MAX_NICE && consumer_nice == MAX_NICE)
> trace_printk("WARNING!!! This test is running at lowest priority.\n");
>
> trace_printk("Time: %lld (usecs)\n", time);



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-22 10:41    [W:0.334 / U:1.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site