lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [Devel] [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: Provide support for ACPI table adding via OS
Date
Hi, Thomas

> From: Devel [mailto:devel-bounces@acpica.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Renninger
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2014 2:44 AM
>
> On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 10:27:23 AM H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Why can't you add SSDTs? It would be particularly useful.
>
> There are 2 ways how ACPI tables get added:
> - Via pointer from a root table (XSDT or RSDT iirc)
> - Via load statement inside of ACPI context when ACPI BIOS
> code gets executed (iirc the physical address is passed).
>
> The latter is only for SSDTs.
> The problem is that you if you add an SSDT early, it might
> have been intended for overriding when an SSDT gets dynamically
> loaded later when the system is up which is particular useful as
> well if you want to debug this specific BIOS table.
>
> This could be workarounded via a boot param:
> acpi=allow_ssdt_adding
> But this is not nice. Maybe someone has a more elegant idea.
> Something could still be added if someone is really needing this.

I'm not sure if you are talking about the issue that:
If a system booted using customized DSDT embedded with SSDT, it also requires dynamic SSDT loading be prevented in ACPICA.

Thanks and best regards
-Lv


>
> Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> Devel mailing list
> Devel@acpica.org
> https://lists.acpica.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-21 09:01    [W:0.109 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site