lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Has slab ctor operation changed? -- was [PATCH 1/1] afs: afs_alloc_inode: use kmem_cache_zalloc
On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 22:23:15 +0000
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:

> Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> wrote:
>
> > afs_vnode is currently cleared with 2 memsets after allocation and
> > 1 in constructor (afs_i_init_once).
> > -This patch calls zalloc for explicit zero fill.
>
> Ummm... This patch isn't necessarily correct in the substantiative portions.
>
> Since afs_i_init_once() is called by the slab allocator during the course of
> kmem_cache_alloc(), how does kmem_cache_zalloc() interact with that?

Object of this patch was to replace any kmem_cache_alloc by kmem_cache_zalloc
so I guess what is done in the patch v2 in afs_alloc_inode below zalloc
would be ok (leaving ctor how it is) ?

>
> IIRC, it used to be that the ctor() function was called when the pages were
> allocated to the slab - and it wasn't called again, even if the object was
> allocated, deallocated and reallocated. This means that things like locks and
> lists don't need reinitialising after allocation.
>
> So afs_i_init_once() theoretically constructs the stuff that can be reused,
> and afs_alloc_inode() therefore has to clear the non-reusable state.
>
> Of course, it's possible that the slab allocator no longer works like this...
>
> David


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-21 07:41    [W:0.077 / U:0.684 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site