Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Feb 2014 18:49:33 -0800 | From | Guenter Roeck <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3.13 00/40] 3.13.4-stable review |
| |
On 02/20/2014 03:32 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 03:23:32PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:32:20AM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 08:30:26PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 02:47:01PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.13.4 release. >>>>> There are 40 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>>> let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Responses should be made by Thu Feb 20 22:44:22 UTC 2014. >>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Build results: >>>> total: 126 pass: 122 skipped: 4 fail: 0 >>>> >>>> qemu tests all passed. >>>> >>>> Details are available at http://server.roeck-us.net:8010/builders. >>>> >>>> Results are as expected. >>> >>> Thanks for testing and letting me know. Interesting that the pstate >>> buggy patch didn't hit your build system testing... >>> >> Nothing is perfect :-(. You mean the one where your builder >> takes much more time to build the kernel with the patch applied, >> or was here another one ? > > That same patch caused a bunch of boot-time failures on some systems. > But not all of them, I think it depended on the hardware present. >
My tests are not sophisticated enough to catch that kind of problem, sorry. I am more surprised that Fenguang's test robot didn't find it; that thing seems to catch pretty much everything nowadays.
Guenter
| |