lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 0/3] qspinlock: Introducing a 4-byte queue spinlock
On 02/19/2014 03:51 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 07:42:20PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>> On 02/18/2014 04:28 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 02:30:12PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>>>> I will start looking at how to make it work with paravirt. Hopefully, it
>>>> won't take too long.
>>> The cheap way out is to simply switch to the test-and-set spinlock on
>>> whatever X86_FEATURE_ indicates a guest I suppose.
>> I don't think there is X86_FEATURE flag that indicates running in a guest.
>> In fact, a guest should never find out if it is running virtualized.
> No it very much should; how else is paravirt ever going to work?

We do have a CONFIG_PARAVIRT macro that turns on or off PV support. The
queue spinlock can be easily changed into an unfair lock which allows
lock stealing. We could have a config option to make it unfair in the
PARAVIRT environment, but I don't think Linus like the idea of an unfair
lock.

-Longman


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-19 21:01    [W:0.126 / U:1.740 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site