Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Wed, 19 Feb 2014 09:46:31 +0800 | From | Bo Shen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] USB: at91: using USBA_NR_DMAS for DMA channels |
| |
On 02/19/2014 09:22 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 09:14:58AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: >> Hi Felipe Balbi, >> >> On 02/19/2014 12:19 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:59:25AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: >>>> When the SoC is earlier than sama5d3 SoC, which have the same number >>>> endpoints and DMAs. However for sama5d3 SoC, it has different number >>>> for endpoints and DMAs. So, define USBA_NR_DMAs for DMA channels >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen <voice.shen@atmel.com> >>>> --- >>>> >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c | 2 +- >>>> drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h | 2 +- >>>> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c >>>> index 7e67a81..5cded1c 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c >>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.c >>>> @@ -1661,7 +1661,7 @@ static irqreturn_t usba_udc_irq(int irq, void *devid) >>>> if (dma_status) { >>>> int i; >>>> >>>> - for (i = 1; i < USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS; i++) >>>> + for (i = 1; i < USBA_NR_DMAS; i++) >>>> if (dma_status & (1 << i)) >>>> usba_dma_irq(udc, &udc->usba_ep[i]); >>>> } >>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h >>>> index 2922db5..a70706e 100644 >>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h >>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/atmel_usba_udc.h >>>> @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ >>>> #define USBA_FIFO_BASE(x) ((x) << 16) >>>> >>>> /* Synth parameters */ >>>> -#define USBA_NR_ENDPOINTS 7 >>>> +#define USBA_NR_DMAS 7 >>> >>> what's the difference ? You just renamed this macro. Also, please >>> clarify a bit your commit log. >> >> As commit message said, the SoC before sama5d3, the endpoint number >> is the same as DMA channel number, so use endpoints definition for >> DMA channel number, however after sama5d3, the endpoints is not the >> same as DMA channel, so use DMA micro for DMA channels. > > which means you're just renaming the macro for the sake of clarity. > That's fine, just needs to be clearer in commit message.
Thanks, I will send v2 to make the commit message more clearer.
Best Regards, Bo Shen
|  |