Messages in this thread | | | From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/5] intel_pstate updates for v3.14-rcX | Date | Wed, 19 Feb 2014 01:34:35 +0100 |
| |
On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 03:53:48 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: > On 02/18/2014 02:27 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2014 12:29:54 PM Dirk Brandewie wrote: > >> Hi Rafael, > > > > Hi, > > > >> On 02/12/2014 10:01 AM, dirk.brandewie@gmail.com wrote: > >>> From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.j.brandewie@intel.com> > >>> > >>> Based on v3.14-rc2 > >>> > >>> Patch 1 removes energy reporting the patch from Maurizio Lambardi > >>> intel_pstate: fix race condition in intel_pstate_init() can be dropped. > >>> > >> > >> Any reason why patches 2-5 did not make rc3 other than timing? > >> > >> Patches 2/3 can easily wait for v3.15.x > >> > >> Patches 4/5 fix bugs that are in the wild. > > > > I asked you about them, but you didn't reply: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-pm&m=139225158531023&w=4 > > > > Again, do patches [4-5/5] depend on [2-3/5]? > > > > If not, I can queue them up for -rc4. > > All the patches are independent of one another. > > Patch 2 is straight cleanup no functional change but reduces the memory > footprint slightly. > > Patch 3 is a bug that will only be seen when the PID is reset at init time > or when a change is made to PID params via debugfs. The problem will only > exist for one sample time since it is setting last_err in the PID. > > Patch 4-5 are bugs found during Baytrail-T testing
Are there any pointers to bug reports that may be included in the changelogs of these?
Rafael
| |