Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Feb 2014 18:59:31 +0000 | From | "Joseph S. Myers" <> | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/5] arch: atomic rework |
| |
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014, Torvald Riegel wrote:
> glibc is a counterexample that comes to mind, although it's a smaller > code base. (It's currently not using C11 atomics, but transitioning > there makes sense, and some thing I want to get to eventually.)
glibc is using C11 atomics (GCC builtins rather than _Atomic / <stdatomic.h>, but using __atomic_* with explicitly specified memory model rather than the older __sync_*) on AArch64, plus in certain cases on ARM and MIPS.
-- Joseph S. Myers joseph@codesourcery.com
| |