lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 24/52] x86, intel, rapl: Fix CPU hotplug callback registration
Date
Subsystems that want to register CPU hotplug callbacks, as well as perform
initialization for the CPUs that are already online, often do it as shown
below:

get_online_cpus();

for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);

register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

put_online_cpus();

This is wrong, since it is prone to ABBA deadlocks involving the
cpu_add_remove_lock and the cpu_hotplug.lock (when running concurrently
with CPU hotplug operations).

Instead, the correct and race-free way of performing the callback
registration is:

cpu_notifier_register_begin();

for_each_online_cpu(cpu)
init_cpu(cpu);

/* Note the use of the double underscored version of the API */
__register_cpu_notifier(&foobar_cpu_notifier);

cpu_notifier_register_done();


Fix the intel rapl code in x86 by using this latter form of callback
registration.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
index 5ad35ad..059218e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_rapl.c
@@ -646,19 +646,20 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
/* unsupported */
return 0;
}
- get_online_cpus();
+
+ cpu_notifier_register_begin();

for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
rapl_cpu_prepare(cpu);
rapl_cpu_init(cpu);
}

- perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier);
+ __perf_cpu_notifier(rapl_cpu_notifier);

ret = perf_pmu_register(&rapl_pmu_class, "power", -1);
if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
pr_info("RAPL PMU detected, registration failed (%d), RAPL PMU disabled\n", ret);
- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();
return -1;
}

@@ -672,7 +673,7 @@ static int __init rapl_pmu_init(void)
hweight32(rapl_cntr_mask),
ktime_to_ms(pmu->timer_interval));

- put_online_cpus();
+ cpu_notifier_register_done();

return 0;
}


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-14 14:41    [W:1.994 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site