Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 13 Feb 2014 22:32:53 +0100 | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Subject | Re: lockdep: strange %s#5 lock name |
| |
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 04:26:45PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > > It seems to me that when the second time alloc_workqueue() is called > > from the same code path, it would have two locks with the same key, but > > not the same &wq->name, which doesn't meet lockdep's assumption. > > Dang... I reverted the previous patch for now. Peter, does this > approach sound good to you?
Whatever works I suppose; like Li said; a little ugly but not sure we can do better.
|  |