[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to pci_disable_msi()
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 11:30:44PM +0200, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas <> writes:
> >> Well, as this series is small I thought it could quickly go thru your
> >> tree. But since ipr had conflicts, there is no point routing all patches
> >> altogether, so up to you guys. The wil6210 patch is already in your pci/msi
> >> branch though.
> >
> > It's in pci/msi, but that's not in my -next branch yet, so I can
> > easily drop it. Do drivers/net/wireless patches normally follow a
> > different path than the other drivers/net patches? The wil6210 and
> > ath10k patches look just like the others in the 34-patch series (bnx2,
> > bnx2x, tg3, bna, cxgb3, etc.), so I thought it would make more sense
> > to include them there.
> ath10k patches normally go through my ath.git tree to Linville and then
> to David Miller. To avoid conflicts I would prefer to take ath10k
> patches to my tree whenever possible.

CC'ing Vladimir, in case he decides to do the same with wil6210.

> --
> Kalle Valo

Alexander Gordeev

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-13 15:01    [W:0.112 / U:0.732 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site