Messages in this thread |  | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH] Fix: module signature vs tracepoints: add new TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE | Date | Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:54:42 +1030 |
| |
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> writes: > On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 08:27:38 +0100 > Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > >> >> * Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> wrote: >> >> > Users have reported being unable to trace non-signed modules loaded >> > within a kernel supporting module signature. >> >> External modules should strive to get out of the 'crap' and >> 'felony law breaker' categories and we should not make it >> easier for them to linger in a broken state. >> >> Nacked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Well, distributions which sign their modules are sending a pretty strong "go away" signal already.
I'm ambivalent towards out-of-tree modules, so not tempted unless I see a bug report indicating a concrete problem. Then we can discuss...
Cheers, Rusty.
|  |