[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to pci_disable_msi()
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Kalle Valo <> wrote:
> Bjorn Helgaas <> writes:
>>> Well, as this series is small I thought it could quickly go thru your
>>> tree. But since ipr had conflicts, there is no point routing all patches
>>> altogether, so up to you guys. The wil6210 patch is already in your pci/msi
>>> branch though.
>> It's in pci/msi, but that's not in my -next branch yet, so I can
>> easily drop it. Do drivers/net/wireless patches normally follow a
>> different path than the other drivers/net patches? The wil6210 and
>> ath10k patches look just like the others in the 34-patch series (bnx2,
>> bnx2x, tg3, bna, cxgb3, etc.), so I thought it would make more sense
>> to include them there.
> ath10k patches normally go through my ath.git tree to Linville and then
> to David Miller. To avoid conflicts I would prefer to take ath10k
> patches to my tree whenever possible.

OK, I won't do anything with ath10k (I haven't applied it anywhere).
And if Alexander re-posts the networking series (I think he might, to
add a pci_enable_msix_exact() interface), maybe he can include wil6210
with that series.


 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-12 23:21    [W:0.130 / U:21.088 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site