[lkml]   [2014]   [Feb]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] ath10k: Get rid of superfluous call to pci_disable_msi()
Bjorn Helgaas <> writes:

>> Well, as this series is small I thought it could quickly go thru your
>> tree. But since ipr had conflicts, there is no point routing all patches
>> altogether, so up to you guys. The wil6210 patch is already in your pci/msi
>> branch though.
> It's in pci/msi, but that's not in my -next branch yet, so I can
> easily drop it. Do drivers/net/wireless patches normally follow a
> different path than the other drivers/net patches? The wil6210 and
> ath10k patches look just like the others in the 34-patch series (bnx2,
> bnx2x, tg3, bna, cxgb3, etc.), so I thought it would make more sense
> to include them there.

ath10k patches normally go through my ath.git tree to Linville and then
to David Miller. To avoid conflicts I would prefer to take ath10k
patches to my tree whenever possible.

Kalle Valo

 \ /
  Last update: 2014-02-12 23:01    [W:0.063 / U:0.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site